PDA

View Full Version : Lost with KK and AQo



iceTray
03-04-2011, 05:46 PM
So here's my two worst hands from my last session.


$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
OnGame
4 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com (http://weaktight.com/)

Stacks:
UTG PSNic ($21.65)
CO Martynukas ($42.03)
BTN Hero ($22.73)
BB Winci ($24.02)

Pre-Flop: ($0.10, 4 players) Hero is BTN :kd: :kh:
1 fold, Martynukas raises to $0.40, Hero raises to $1.25, 1 fold, Martynukas calls $0.85

Flop: :5d: :5c: :5h: ($2.60, 2 players)
Martynukas checks, Hero bets $1.95, Martynukas calls $1.95

Turn: :tc: ($6.50, 2 players)
Martynukas checks, Hero bets $4, Martynukas calls $4

River: :qc: ($14.50, 2 players)
Martynukas checks, Hero ($15.53)?

Is there any value in a river bet or I should checkback?

The second one:

I have only 9 hands about vlk64 so it doesn't make sense.

$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
OnGame
4 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com (http://weaktight.com/)

Stacks:
CO dedyys84 ($8.45)
BTN bossanova32 ($7.98)
SB Hero ($9.51)
BB vlk64 ($11.95)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 4 players) Hero is SB :ad: :qs:
2 folds, Hero raises to $0.30, vlk64 calls $0.20

Flop: :4c: :tc: :4d: ($0.60, 2 players)
Hero checks, vlk64 checks

Turn: :jh: ($0.60, 2 players)
Hero checks, vlk64 bets $0.25, Hero calls $0.25

River: :kd: ($1.10, 2 players)
Hero checks, vlk64 bets $0.80, Hero raises to $2.25, vlk64 goes all-in $11.40, Hero goes all-in $6.71

I'd like to ask you to express your opinions about this line, because I was completely lost in this situation.

castor11
03-04-2011, 05:56 PM
I bet on river 8-9$ with KK.
I think raise/fold with AQ. Usually 3bet and c/r ai on river the nuts in microstakes. I never seen bluff same situation.

Holdenper
03-04-2011, 07:04 PM
I bet big on the river with KK...he'll call with Qx, maybe Tx, 88+...well, we've got ~potsize stack, so I would shove. Don't think that he can throw away any decent full. Go for the max value!

2nd hand: Ouch...The turn is a nasty spot...You can be drawing dead, maybe 7-10 outs, but his bet is so tiny:-/ i dunno...maybe a fold? Maybe it's weaktight, but a call doesn't seem right... On the river I would bet-call. I want value from AJ, QJ, AT, QT, Q9, KQ, KJ, KT, K9, A4, etc.
When u CR and the villain 3bet shoves, it's a fold, u can beat Q9, KJ, KT...but mostly he'll have some kind of boat

NitroHUN
03-04-2011, 07:49 PM
Definietly no checkback on hand no.1, consider your stack allin, you can shove or just bet like 1/3 of the pot to milk some Txs, mid pairs into calling, stack sizes are horrible for a check/raise so he would never do that.

2nd hand shoulda been cbet i guess (unless stats indicate), but after his check thats a good turn to bet out on. If you get raised, easy fold. If he calls and you hit your straight, you can still play it both ways. (safe or broke)

iceTray
03-04-2011, 07:56 PM
Thanks for your nitices. With KK I bet 10$ and I got shoved which I must have callet. Unfortunately I ran into QQs :)

In the second hand I like the raise/fold play which I should do in situations like that. The villain showed me T4 of course :)

Lev729
03-04-2011, 10:15 PM
KK: check back.

In his river range there are no Tx or Qx. Only pocket 66-AA. (Anything else he folded on flop and turn.)
He never call on river with 66-99. Maybe JJ. TT, QQ and AA are beat us.

AQ: Bet every street! If you missed the cbet I think your line is fine.

Holdenper
03-05-2011, 12:06 AM
KK: check back.

In his river range there are no Tx or Qx. Only pocket 66-AA. (Anything else he folded on flop and turn.)
He never call on river with 66-99. Maybe JJ. TT, QQ and AA are beat us.


I don't agree, unless he's a good reg he'll peel one with every facecards like KT+, QT+, JT, A8+. OTT he may have picked up some FD (yeah, fishes will peel with FD when there is three 5s on the board:D ), or he hit he's Tx. If u play a little bit laggy game (20-27/18-25, AF% 40+) maybe he's planning to call down u with 22+, AQ, AJ, something like that - I say once again, it's only apply when the villain is a fish!

iceTray
03-05-2011, 11:30 AM
This villain's stats weren't fishy so far, sg like 28/10 maybe. But at this time there was qutie a mad play at the tables. I seen him calling an all-in with Q9s at 150bb deep. And i think he would have called my river bet too if the Q didn't come on the river.